Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1185

reference
889-tree-1
name
1185
tree-preservation-order

undefined

889-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.017815 50.879230)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.017758 50.879224,-1.017761 50.879235,-1.017769 50.879245,-1.017781 50.879253,-1.017797 50.879258,-1.017814 50.879260,-1.017832 50.879258,-1.017848 50.879253,-1.017861 50.879246,-1.017869 50.879236,-1.017872 50.879225,-1.017869 50.879213,-1.017862 50.879203,-1.017849 50.879195,-1.017833 50.879190,-1.017816 50.879188,-1.017798 50.879190,-1.017782 50.879195,-1.017770 50.879203,-1.017761 50.879213,-1.017758 50.879224)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL